Information component |
Pg 4 Health Summary – Indicator 15 |
Subject category / domain(s) |
The way we live |
Indicator name (* Indicator title in health profile) |
Adults participating in recommended levels of physical activity (*Physically active adults) |
PHO with lead responsibility |
SEPHO |
Date of PHO dataset creation |
26/01/2007 |
Indicator definition |
Participation in *moderate intensity sport and active recreation on 20 or more days in the previous 4 weeks, (averaging 5 or more times per week), percentage, persons, aged 16 and over, 2005/06, as percentage respondents of the Sport England Active People Survey, 2006 |
Geography |
England, GOR, Local Authority: Counties, County Districts, Metropolitan County Districts, Unitary Authorities, London Boroughs. |
Timeliness |
Survey repeated 3 yearly, the next one will be due in 2008/2009 |
Rationale:What this indicator purports to measure
|
This indicator estimates the proportion of adults participating in physical activity beneficial to health. |
Rationale:Public Health Importance
|
People who have a physically active lifestyle are at approximately half the risk of developing coronary heart disease compared to those who have a sedentary lifestyle. Regular physical activity is also associated with a reduced risk of diabetes, obesity, osteoporosis and colon cancer and with improved mental health. In older adults physical activity is associated with increased functional capacities.In terms of mortality, morbidity and quality of life, the Chief Medical Officer has estimated the cost of inactivity in England to be £8.2 billion annually.Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to increase the population levels of physical activity is summarised by Kahn E, Ramsey L, Brownson R, Heath G, Howze E, Powell K, et al. ‘The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Physical Activity: A Systematic Review’. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22 (4S). |
Rationale: Purpose behind the inclusion of the indicator |
To estimate prevalence of physical activity beneficial to health in the populationTo monitor the effectiveness of programmes aiming to increase participation of adults in sport and active recreationThe indicator is a measure of health need i.e. the ability to benefit from public health interventions aiming to improve levels of physical activity beneficial to health in the adult population. |
Rationale:Policy relevance
|
Choosing Health: making healthy choices easier, Department of Health, 2004http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4094550Choosing Health: a physical activity action plan, Department of Health, 2005http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/ @dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4105710.pdfAt Least Five a Week: Evidence on the Impact of Physical Activity and its Relationship to Health, 2004 – report by the CMOhttp://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/ @dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4080981.pdfGame Plan: A Strategy for Delivering Government’s Sport and Physical Activity Objectives, 2002http://www.sportdevelopment.org.uk/html/gameplan.html Sport England has as an objective agreed with Government to increase participation in sport by an average of 1% a year over the next three years to 2008. The Framework for Sport in England has identified a longer-term target to continue this growth to at least 2020 to establish England as the most active nation in the world. |
Interpretation: What a high / low level of indicator value means |
A high indicator value (amber circle in health summary chart) represents a statistically significant higher estimated percentage of adults participating in physical activity and recreation beneficial to health for that local authority when compared to the England average value.A low indicator value (red circle in health summary chart) represents a statistically significant lower estimated percentage of adults participating in physical activity and recreation beneficial to health for that local authority when compared to the England average value. |
Interpretation: Potential for error due to type of measurement method |
Sport England numerator data are based on observed self-reported physical activity levels in the previous 4 weeks through a series of questions which focus on walking, cycling and other types of sport and recreational physical activity. Self-reported physical activity levels may be prone to respondent bias. Respondents are required to remember how long each session of physical activity lasted and describe the intensity level of the activity they undertook. As a result, levels of physical activity are likely to be over-reported.The Active People Survey measured sport and active recreation but excludes other forms of physical activity such as housework, DIY, activity in ones job etc. and this can lead to under-estimation of levels. |
Interpretation: Potential for error due to bias and confounding |
This measure of adults participating in recommended levels of physical activity is a crude proportion and no age-standardisation has been applied to the results to adjust for differences in age structure between areas. It is likely that a greater proportion of younger people undertake levels of physical activity than older people.Details of the sampling frame used and which groups may have been under sampled (e.g. ethnic minorities, those without telephone access etc) were not available at the time of creation of this indicator. Therefore, it is not known how representative of the general population the survey results are. |
Confidence Intervals: Definition and purpose |
A confidence interval is a range of values that is normally used to describe the uncertainty around a point estimate of a quantity, for example, a mortality rate. This uncertainty arises as factors influencing the indicator are subject to chance occurrences that are inherent in the world around us. These occurrences result in random fluctuations in the indicator value between different areas and time periods. In the case of indicators based on a sample of the population, uncertainty also arises from random differences between the sample and the population itself.The stated value should therefore be considered as only an estimate of the true or ‘underlying’ value. Confidence intervals quantify the uncertainty in this estimate and, generally speaking, describe how much different the point estimate could have been if the underlying conditions stayed the same, but chance had led to a different set of data. The wider is the confidence interval the greater is the uncertainty in the estimate.Confidence intervals are given with a stated probability level. In Health Profiles 2007 this is 95%, and so we say that there is a 95% probability that the interval covers the true value. The use of 95% is arbitrary but is conventional practice in medicine and public health. The confidence intervals have also been used to make comparisons against the national value. For this purpose the national value has been treated as an exact reference value rather than as an estimate and, under these conditions, the interval can be used to test whether the value is statistically significantly different to the national. If the interval includes the national value, the difference is not statistically significant and the value is shown on the health summary chart with a white symbol. If the interval does not include the national value, the difference is statistically significant and the value is shown on the health summary chart with a red or amber symbol depending on whether it is worse or better than the national value respectively. |