8. BREAST FEEDING GAP INDICATOR
TABLE 1 – INDICATOR DESCRIPTION
Information component | P4 Health Summary – Indicator 8 |
Subject category / domain(s) | Giving children and young people a healthy start |
Indicator name (* Indicator title in health profile) | Initiation of breastfeeding (“Breastfeeding”) |
PHO with lead responsibility | ERPHO |
Date of PHO dataset creation | N/A |
Indicator definition | Breastfeeding initiation, proportion, all ages, [time period], females |
Geography | County/ LA not available |
Timeliness | Annual |
Rationale:What this indicator purports to measure | Breastfeeding |
Rationale:Public Health Importance | Breast milk is the best form of nutrition for infants. The DH recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life, with breastfeeding continuing after this age, along with other types of solid foods. Althoughnot all mothers will achieve this, even a short period of breastfeeding confers benefit on the infant, and should be encouraged.There is a large body of evidence that has show breast-feeding to be associated with better infant and child health, helping to protect infants against gastroenteritis and respiratory infections, otitis media, urinary tract infection, atopic disease and possibly obesity. Breastfeeding is also beneficial to the mother’s health. Breastfeeding is thus likely to make an important contribution towards meeting the target to reduce inequalities in infant mortality. DH. Health Inequalities: national targets on infant mortality and life expectancy; technical briefing. London 2002. |
Rationale: Purpose behind the inclusion of the indicator | This indicator is collected a part of the performance framework for PCOs and is considered to be indicative of good child health, a marker for inequality as breastfeeding rates tend to be lower in disadvantaged groups and of well performing health services for mothers and children. |
Rationale:Reason for Gap | It was not included in HP 2007 for 3 reasons:
Further work is needed on this indicator to test its fitness for purpose for HP3 and to devise a strategy for improving its utility. |
Rationale:Policy relevance | Children’s NSFPriorities and planning framework 2003-6 |
Interpretation: What a high / low level of indicator value means | N/A |
Interpretation: Potential for error due to type of measurement method | N/A |
Interpretation: Potential for error due to bias and confounding | N/A |
Confidence Intervals: Definition and purpose | N/A |
TABLE 2 – INDICATOR SPECIFICATION
Indicator definition: Variable | Breastfeeding initiation |
Indicator definition: Statistic | Proportion of maternities |
Indicator definition: Gender | Female |
Indicator definition: age group | All ages |
Indicator definition: period | [time period] |
Indicator definition: scale | % |
Geography: geographies available for this indicator from other providers | England, GOR, SHA, PCO |
Dimensions of inequality: subgroup analyses of this dataset available from other providers | |
Data extraction: Source | Local Delivery Plans returns (LDPR) |
Data extraction: source URL | UNIFY2 (DH reporting system) |
Data extraction: date | N/A |
Numerator: definition | Number of new maternities initiating breastfeeding |
Numerator: source | LDPR |
Denominator: definition | Number of maternities |
Denominator: source | LDPR |
Data quality: Accuracy and completeness | N/A |
Posted in: Indicators