Information component |
Pg 4 Health Summary – Indicator No 11 |
Subject category / domain(s) |
Giving children and young people a healthy start |
Indicator name (* Indicator title in health profile) |
Teenage conceptions (“Teenage pregnancy (under 18)” ) |
PHO with lead responsibility |
EMPHO |
Date of PHO dataset creation |
August 2006 |
Indicator definition |
Under-18 conception rate per 1,000 females (crude rate) 2002-2004. |
Geography |
England, GOR, Local Authority: Counties, County Districts, Metropolitan County Districts, Unitary Authorities, London Boroughs |
Timeliness |
Data published 14 months after period end, updated annually. (Raw data is available up to 11 months after the event) |
Rationale:What this indicator purports to measure
|
This indicator measures the level of teenage conceptions in the area. |
Rationale:Public Health Importance
|
Teenage pregnancy is a significant public health issue in England. Teenage parents are prone to poor antenatal health, lower birth weight babies and higher infant mortality rates. Teenage mothers are less likely to finish their education, less likely to find a good job, and more likely to end up as single parents or bringing up their children in poverty. Children born to teenage mothers run a much greater risk of poor health and have a much higher chance of becoming teenage mothers themselves. However, it is worth remembering that many young people are successful in adapting to the role of parenthood and have happy, healthy children.For further information see “Teenage Pregnancy: Accelerating the Strategy to 2010” (http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/_files/ 94C1FA2E9D4C9717E5D0AF1413A329A4.pdf) and Health Statistics Quarterly No. 33 (page 34) (http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_health/hsq33web.pdf) |
Rationale: Purpose behind the inclusion of the indicator |
The purpose of including this indicator is to highlight local authorities with high teenage pregnancy rates in order to assess need and enable targeted intervention. In order to assist local areas in reducing under-18 conception rates the following toolkit was produced by DfES. It provides local areas with detailed guidance on the key ingredients that need to be in place locally to reduce under-18 conception rates. www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/resources-and-practice/IG00198/ |
Rationale:Policy relevance
|
Teenage conceptions are an important public health target. There is a national PSA target to reduce teenage conception rates by 50% by 2010 with an intermediate target for a 15% reduction by 2004 (1998 baseline). Teenage conception targets feature in the performance ratings for PCTs and in the Priorities and Planning Framework 2003-2006 (seehttp://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4008430). This indicator supports Choosing Health and Programme for Action. |
Interpretation: What a high / low level of indicator value means |
A high indicator value (red blob) represents a statistically significant higher rate of teenage conceptions for that local authority when compared to the national average.A low indicator value (yellow blob) represents a statistically significant lower rate of teenage conceptions for that local authority when compared to the national average.Rates that are lower than the England average may still represent a large number of teenage pregnancies and therefore a low indicator value should not be interpreted as meaning that public health action is not needed. |
Interpretation: Potential for error due to type of measurement method |
Miscarriages and illegal abortions are not included in the conception rates, resulting in rates that may be an under estimation. Data relating to legal abortions and births is collated through mandatory reporting processes and is of sound data quality. Whilst it is acknowledged that the non-inclusion of miscarriages reflects conceptions that are not included in these figures, comparable data in this area is not available. Conception cannot be inferred from the prescription of emergency contraception, and early loss of pregnancy may not be recognised or require medical attention. The omission of this data retains the quality of the indicator rather than limiting it. |
Interpretation: Potential for error due to bias and confounding |
Teenage pregnancy is often a cause and a consequence of social exclusion. The risk of teenage parenthood is greatest for young people who have grown up in poverty and disadvantage or those with poor educational attainment. |
Confidence Intervals: Definition and purpose |
A confidence interval is a range of values that is normally used to describe the uncertainty around a point estimate of a quantity, for example, a mortality rate. This uncertainty arises as factors influencing the indicator are subject to chance occurrences that are inherent in the world around us. These occurrences result in random fluctuations in the indicator value between different areas and time periods. In the case of indicators based on a sample of the population, uncertainty also arises from random differences between the sample and the population itself.The stated value should therefore be considered as only an estimate of the true or ‘underlying’ value. Confidence intervals quantify the uncertainty in this estimate and, generally speaking, describe how much different the point estimate could have been if the underlying conditions stayed the same, but chance had led to a different set of data. The wider is the confidence interval the greater is the uncertainty in the estimate.Confidence intervals are given with a stated probability level. In Health Profiles 2007 this is 95%, and so we say that there is a 95% probability that the interval covers the true value. The use of 95% is arbitrary but is conventional practice in medicine and public health. The confidence intervals have also been used to make comparisons against the national value. For this purpose the national value has been treated as an exact reference value rather than as an estimate and, under these conditions, the interval can be used to test whether the value is statistically significantly different to the national. If the interval includes the national value, the difference is not statistically significant and the value is shown on the health summary chart with a white symbol. If the interval does not include the national value, the difference is statistically significant and the value is shown on the health summary chart with a red or amber symbol depending on whether it is worse or better than the national value respectively. |